Physical Server vs. Virtual Machine

Why do we need a Virtual Server?

A physical server, often referred to as a hardware server, comprises components such as a motherboard, CPU, memory, and I/O controllers. It is called a bare-metal server, where the hardware is utilized directly by the operating system without the need for a virtualization platform.

However, in situations where fully supporting business operations requires multiple servers, this can become challenging. Each physical server requires its own space, and many organizations find that their servers are utilizing only a fraction of their capacity, resulting in inefficiencies. Additionally, in a physical server environment, server replacement involves obtaining a new physical machine. Disaster recovery can also be a time-consuming and expensive process.

That is why virtual machines have become such a popular option: where ten or fifteen separate servers once were needed, one physical server can now run ten or fifteen virtual ones.

Another advantage of virtualization is that VMs can be easily moved to different hardware for backup or disaster recovery, and for failover in case of a breakdown. Administrators can also replace hardware without interrupting service, and balance workloads across all available hardware, eliminating downtime.

Does this mean that physical machines are now obsolete compared to virtual servers?

Comparison of优点 and Disadvantages of Virtual Servers versus Physical Servers

While both VMs and bare-metal servers run on server hardware, they each have their own pros and cons.

Performance
When considering scalability, performance is always a key factor in deciding between a virtual or physical server.

A physical server dedicates all of its resources, such as CPU, RAM, and storage, to a single purpose, which typically allows it to perform better when executing a single task. In contrast, a virtual server shares its resources among multiple virtual machines, which can lead to performance degradation if resources are not allocated properly.


Portability
Portability is essential for business continuity, flexibility, and efficient server management.

One of the great advantages of virtual servers is their portability. A virtual machine is essentially a file that can be easily copied, moved, or cloned between different physical machines with no downtime. This makes it very easy to migrate a virtual server from one physical server to another, or even from one data center to another.

Now, physical servers can't be migrated, they're actually installed in a data center or a room, and migrating them takes a lot of work, which involves shutting down the server, physically moving it, and then setting it up again in the new location.

Scalability
Virtual servers are highly scalable since you can easily add more virtual machines (VMs) as your needs grow. VMs can be configured to utilize more or less of the host hardware resources as needed.

But physical servers are limited by hardware. If you reach the capacity of a physical server, you need to purchase and set up another one, which can take time and money.

Management
Virtual servers typically come with management software that simplifies tasks like deployment, monitoring, and maintenance. They can be administered through a centralized console, allowing an administrator to control multiple VMs from a single location.

With physical machines, physical servers typically require more manual management, including the manual installation and configuration of both hardware and software. Moreover, each physical server must be managed individually, which can be time-consuming in large-scale environments.

Availability and Recovery
Virtualization platforms typically offer high availability features. This means that if a physical host fails, the virtual machines (VMs) running on it can automatically migrate and restart on another host, significantly reducing downtime.
In terms of recovery, since VMs are essentially files stored on disks, they can be regularly backed up in full. These backups can then be moved offsite for storage or used to restore VMs on a standby host.
On the other hand, if a physical server fails, services may be inaccessible until necessary repairs or replacements are made, potentially leading to extended downtime. The recovery process for physical servers can also be more complex and time-consuming. While physical servers can be backed up as well, the restoration process is often slower and more intricate, requiring the reinstallation of the operating system and applications before data can be restored.

Costs
The initial cost of physical servers can be substantial, especially when multiple units are needed. Each server requires its own hardware and separate maintenance. In addition, each server may require its own software licenses. Physical servers generally consume more power than virtual ones and require more cooling, leading to higher operating costs.
On the other hand, the initial cost of virtual servers can be significantly lower because a single physical server can host multiple virtual servers, reducing the need for multiple physical units. Maintenance costs may also be lower, as managing and maintaining virtual servers is typically simpler and less time-consuming than with physical servers. However, the cost of virtualization software and potential ongoing licensing fees must be factored in. Virtual servers generally consume less power and cooling than multiple physical servers, thus lowering operating costs.

In short, while virtual servers may involve higher software costs, they usually lead to lower overall costs, owing to more efficient use of hardware resources, lower energy consumption, and simplified maintenance and administration.

Physical Server vs. Virtual Machine

Backup Virtual and Physical Servers with Todo Backup

With the growing reliance on virtual servers in business operations, users need a simple, secure, and efficient way to back up their servers. This is where the Todo Backup solution comes in handy. It offers an all-in-one solution tailored to effectively meet backup needs for both physical and virtual servers.

By installing Todo Backup on the server computer, you can use various backup features to create custom backup tasks.

Physical server vs. virtual machine

Whether you want to back up files, disks, volumes, partitions, operating systems, or even Active Directories, Todo Backup can create a backup job to your specifications.

Physical server vs. virtual machine

To fulfill certain requirements, you might need to back up your machine regularly. Creating a backup schedule can save you time and effort, sparing you from having to recreate backup tasks each time.

Physical Server vs. Virtual Machine

How do you ensure the safety of your images in the face of ransomware or malware threats? We've thought of that, too, and added a feature called “Backup Protection” that prevents your images from being deleted.

Physical Server vs. Virtual Machine

This ensures that nobody can delete your image files without explicit permission.

Physical Server vs Virtual Machine

Want to be kept up-to-date on the status of your backup jobs? Enable this setting to receive email notifications upon completion, whether the job was successful or not.

The main purpose of creating backups is to prepare for possible system crashes. The restore feature allows you to revert your files to the state they were in when the backup image was created. This process essentially undoes the creation of the backup, and is invaluable in safeguarding your computer from various potential disasters, including virus infections, system failures, partition issues, and data loss.

Physical vs Virtual Machine

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

< strong > 1. Are virtual servers more secure than physical servers? < /strong >< br > Virtual servers and physical servers each have their own security considerations. The advantage of virtual servers is that they are isolated from one another, which helps mitigate the risk of cross-contamination. That said, if the host system is compromised, all the virtual servers it hosts could be at risk.

On the other hand, physical servers can be seen as more secure, because they are isolated entities. But managing security patches across multiple physical servers can become complicated and time-consuming.

In short, while virtual servers are isolated from one another, a compromise of the host system puts all of the virtual servers at risk. Though physically isolated, servers still require careful management of security patches across multiple machines.

**2. Can a virtual server perform as well as a physical server?** Physical servers, with their dedicated resources including CPU, memory, storage, and network components, typically offer more power, efficiency, and overall better performance since there is no resource contention. On the other hand, multiple virtual servers must share computing resources, which can lead to performance issues. This may result in decreased efficiency and stability. Even if a virtual server has the same performance and computing resources as a physical server, it may not achieve the same level of performance.

3. How does a Virtual Server work?
A virtual server operates similarly to a physical server but with its resources separated from the actual hardware through virtualization software. This means that each virtual server can run its own operating system, applications, and workloads independently without impacting the resources of the host system.