A file system is a structure that an operating system uses to organize data in groups according to logical rules. Think of a hard drive or server as a library, with each file representing a book. The file system is the shelving and the librarian that keep the books in order and make them easy to find.
A file system enables the operating system to manage data and files more efficiently and logically. It allows users to easily read, access, write, modify, and protect data on a device.
NTFS is a file system introduced by Microsoft.
Back in the Windows 98 days, Microsoft used the FAT32 file system with a 32-bit file allocation table. Starting around 2000, disk capacities began to grow significantly. FAT32 greatly increased the ability to manage disks, breaking through the 2 GB partition limit of FAT16.
After Windows 98, Microsoft introduced the New Technology File System (NTFS) with Windows NT in 1993, which it has used in all versions up to and including Windows 8.
NTFS supports metadata and is more efficient in its use of disk space than FAT32. Operating systems formatted with FAT32 support partitions of up to 32 GB, whereas those using NTFS can support disks of up to 2 TB.
While NTFS offered great features, it eventually showed some drawbacks, such as limited compatibility and inability to provide maximum data availability on large datasets across different workloads.
In an attempt to address the problems with NTFS, Microsoft introduced a new advanced file system in September 2012: the Resilient File System (ReFS), also known as “Protogon.”
ReFS is designed from the NTFS codebase. Microsoft wants it to provide maximum data availability and meet users' growing storage needs. And Windows is getting ReFS support.
Compared to NTFS, ReFS does offer improved resilience, especially in scenarios with older disks or where power failures occur during movie playback, for example. The improvements come from changes under the hood, such as how file metadata is stored and updated. ReFS is designed to work with Storage Spaces striped volumes. When a disk fails, ReFS can perform system-level checksums to detect errors and correctly rebuild files.
And, while Microsoft has put a lot of effort into designing ReFS, and it has some features that NTFS lacks, it is still too immature to be a credible alternative to NTFS.
While both ReFS and NTFS are file systems introduced by Microsoft, and ReFS incorporates some NTFS code, they still have significant differences. Here, we will analyze the distinctions between ReFS and NTFS across four aspects: reliability, scalability, performance, and features.
Both NTFS and ReFS have data integrity tools, but ReFS can automatically verify and repair file corruption without using Check Disk (CHKDSK), while NTFS can't.
As a result, ReFS is more flexible and better able to protect data integrity and availability than NTFS.
With its B+ tree structure, ReFS can store more data per node, resulting in better storage performance than NTFS. While NTFS has a maximum capacity of 16 EB, ReFS can handle an astonishing 262,144 EB. Additionally, ReFS allows for file paths of up to 32,768 characters, compared to NTFS's limit of 255 characters.
ReFS includes a feature called striped parity, which writes data across two tiers of a drive so that the ReFS file system can quickly write data to the mirrored tier and then transfer it to the parity tier, with the calculation performed for each written file. This helps ReFS store data more efficiently and use disk space more effectively.
So ReFS does better than NTFS there.
Because ReFS is built on top of the NTFS code base, it shares many features with NTFS, including:
Comparison Item | ReFS | NTFS |
---|---|---|
Data Deduplication | √ | √ |
Cluster Shared Volume (CSV) Support | √ | √ |
BitLocker Encryption | √ | √ |
Access Control Lists | √ | √ |
Soft Links | √ | √ |
Trim/Unmap | √ | √ |
Change Notifications | √ | √ |
Thin Provisioning | √ | √ |
Junction Points | √ | √ |
USN Journal | √ | √ |
File IDs | √ | √ |
Change Notifications | √ | √ |
Mount Points | √ | √ |
Volume Shadow Copy | √ | √ |
Sparse Files | √ | √ |
Named Streams | √ | √ |
Of course, they also have different features – and that's what this article is all about. Features unique to ReFS (not available in NTFS) include:
Comparison Item | ReFS | NTFS |
---|---|---|
Mirrored parity acceleration | √ | × |
Block cloning | √ | × |
Sparse VDL | √ | × |
Features available only on NTFS (not available on ReFS):
Feature | ReFS | NTFS |
---|---|---|
Transactions | × | √ |
Short file names | × | √ |
Extended attributes | × | √ |
Hard links | × | √ |
Bootable | × | √ |
Support for removable media | × | √ |
Object IDs | × | √ |
Supports page file | × | √ |
Disk quotas | × | √ |
File system encryption | × | √ |
File system compression | × | √ |
Given the differences between NTFS and ReFS outlined above, it's clear that these file systems have different use cases. NTFS is designed to handle a variety of configurations and common everyday usage scenarios. Its features make it more versatile and suitable for most situations. In contrast, ReFS, lacking crucial functionality, is destined not to replace NTFS but rather to complement it.
However, ReFS is essentially a more efficient file system for advanced users. With its unique advanced features, ReFS can provide data protection and recovery for PCs that handle large amounts of data with great flexibility.
In short, NTFS is a more feature-rich and general-purpose file system. For users who need to manage data in large-scale environments and want to preserve data integrity in the face of disk failures, ReFS may be more appealing.
In conclusion, there is no clear winner between ReFS and NTFS. Both file systems have their pros and cons and are suited for different user needs. Hopefully, after reading this article, you can make an informed decision for yourself.